RRP: £19.99
Our Price: £0.90 (subject to change)
Editorial
Amazon.co.uk Review
On the surface, David Cronenberg may seem an unlikely candidate to direct A History of Violence, but dig deeper and you'll see that he's the right man for the job. As an intellectual seeker of meaning and an avowed believer in Darwinian survival of the fittest, Cronenberg knows that the story of mild-mannered small-town diner proprietor Tom Stall (Viggo Mortensen) is in fact a multilayered examination of inbred human behavior, beginning when Tom's skillful killing of two would-be robbers draws unwanted attention to his idyllic family life in rural Indiana. He's got a loving wife (Maria Bello) and young daughter (Heidi Hayes) who are about to learn things about Tom they hadn't suspected, and a teenage son (Ashton Holmes) who has inherited his father's most prominent survival trait, manifesting itself in ways he never expected. By the time Tom has come into contact with a scarred villain (Ed Harris) and connections that lead him to a half-crazy kingpin (William ! Hurt, in a spectacular cameo), Cronenberg has plumbed the dark depths of human nature so skillfully that A History of Violence stands well above the graphic novel that inspired it (indeed, Cronenberg was unaware of the source material behind Josh Olson's chilling adaptation). With hard-hitting violence that's as sudden as it is graphically authentic, this is A History of Violence that's worthy of serious study and widespread acclaim. --Jeff Shannon
A History of Violence
Review date: 2008-11-27 Rating: 6 out of 10
"survival of the fittest" is an active ingredient into the storytelling of the movie - beginning with Tom Stall's skilful killing of two men who attempt to rob his diner. Hailed as a hero, the unwanted attention gathered from the attack threatens Tom's idyllic rural family life when a shady man (played by Ed Harris) begins accusing Tom (Viggo Mortensen) of being someone who has wronged him in the past.
Blood, gore, and violence most certainly tick the boxes for the crime genre, and it's not long before it is introduced. Beginning with a surreal, ambiguous and highly disturbing scene in which murder and seduction is hinted - the movie starts off with a promising and cleverly filmed sequence. The movie thereafter slows down dramatically, as it attempts to portray Tom's "normal" life to the viewer through over-acting and ridiculous sex scenes - which seem to have no relevance to the build up of storyline at all. The incorporation of Tom's teenage son and his troubles with school only manage to infuriate the viewer even more - as poor acting and farfetched sequences occur only as a means that he actually exists in his father's perfect world. Arguably, his natural instinct to demolish the school bully's face hints to his father's true identity, but it seems a little over-the-top, and doesn't seem to push the plot forward at all. His story seems to stop half way through the movie, after his father kills even more mobsters who arrive from Philly after they ask him to "come for a ride". Another exaggerated scene - which leaves the viewer asking "why?" over and over again, with no sufficient answer but for the fact that Tom Stall, is but another villain in a movie full of the latter.
Having said that, the story, which is loosely based on the graphic novels by Josh Olsen, is not a complete disaster. It proves to be original, despite it's obvious crime genre clichés, and authentic bloody culture; and the cameo appearance of William Hurt and "bad guy" Ed Harris are more than sufficient for the viewing of the film. Both actors prove to be superb villains, and the edge-of-your-seat factor is introduced wildly from their splendid performances.
With mixed audience reaction, it may still be a while before David Cronenberg manages to create his masterpiece. Many, however, believe this to be it, but the overall feel from the film for me was that it was good... but not brilliant. However, it was original and thought provoking, and well worth a watch at least once.