RRP: £19.99
Our Price: £0.49 (subject to change)
Editorial
Amazon.co.uk Review
Julia Roberts' command of the screen is so effortless, it's easy for moviegoers to take her for granted--but we shouldn't. Mona Lisa Smile--about a non-comformist teacher at a private school who encourages students to pursue their individuality--is pretty much an all-girls version of Dead Poets Society that mixes 50s fashions with 70s feminist thought. However, its lack of ambition doesn't diminish the talent that's gone into it: the writing and directing are well-honed and skilful; the actors--a talent-studded cast featuring Marcia Gay Harden, Kirsten Dunst, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Julia Stiles and Juliet Stevenson--are uniformly excellent. But without question, Mona Lisa Smile rides on Roberts' shoulders and she carries it with ease. She's possibly the only contemporary actor who simply owns a movie the way Bette Davis, Jean Arthur, or Claudette Colbert once did, radiating a engaging mix of intelligence, drive, and emotional warmth that cannot be matched. --Bret Fetzer
Carpe Diem girls!
Review date: 2008-02-11 Rating: 6 out of 10
The best to summarise the film would be to call it "The feminist Dead Poets' Society". The storylines are very similar. The campus environment of a girls' college is suddenly changed by an arts teacher who preaches her students to get a life. Not the life that is planned for them --mother and housewife. For me the film beautifully creates the same atmosphere arranged by schoolmasters, orthodox teachers, busybody parents in 1950'a America. The role of the woman in those days' society was diminished only to certain jobs and areas. This unequality is shockingly revealed through out the film. In the final scenes of the film the teacher shows slides to her students. In the slides are wonderful and happy women doing housework, cooking, cleaning, ironing. Not the life a learned woman wants, or is it?
In fact, Julia Roberts (whose doing her usual Julia Robert's style acting - so not bad, just what we've come to expect from her) had better watch out - these youths will be the superstars of tomorrow, and could well take away her Best Actress Ever tag!
Among them are Kirsten Dunst, Maggie Gyllenhal, Julia Stiles and Topher Grace (although that last one isn't female, but he certainly proves his worth in this film and is surely someone to look out for!). In fact, The best parts of this film are when the students are on screen. Fun, attractive and easily the most exciting bit of the film.
Because other than that, it's quite exceptionally boring. School lessons were never fun, and when they appear in this film, it almost as if you are back in class again. Authenticity is great, but not when it's something as snooze worthy as that.
Another annoying factor is how everything in the film is related to art. Art is obviously a big factor of the film, but life doesn't always have a relevence in art. So that aspect of the film seemed forced, and at times over sentimental.
But it's hard not to get wrapped up in the young students lives. Will they marry and follow the tradition, or take on a job and be pro-feminist. By the end, you will care for each and every character, and want them to make the right choice.
Maggie Gyllenhal's sexpot temptress, and Dunst's conflict with Roberts teacher are surely the standout moments in the film.
But come the overly schmaltzy end, was this film really worth it? It only lasts for a school calender year, and as the film never shows what actually happens to the students when they leave college, it seems like a lot of feminist movement preaching and ideas had been shoved down our throat without a conclusion as to whther any of it helped the characters or not. It's not a bad film, it is just incomplete.
Extras wise, we get input from all the main cast on the film, and some slightly interesting info comparing colleges and female life then and now.