Doctor Zhivago [2002]
RRP: £14.99
Our Price: £11.00 (subject to change)
Editorial
Amazon.co.uk Review
The mini-series treatment suits Doctor Zhivago, Boris Pasternak's sprawling novel of a Russian physician-poet whose comfortable life is upended by the revolution. And this near-four-hour Granada TV production lucidly demonstrates that Pasternak was one heck of a storyteller: the torment of Zhivago (Hans Matheson) as he must choose between his well-bred childhood sweetheart (Alexandra Maria Lara) and the tragically beautiful Lara (Keira Knightley) remains compelling. The TV treatment can't match the epic sweep of David Lean's feature film, of course, with its cast of thousands and astonishing production design. Devotees of that 1965 version will undoubtedly yearn for Maurice Jarre's tinkly hit "Lara's Theme", too; here, Ludovico Einaudi's score is serviceable by comparison. Matheson, too, is serviceable in the title role, but the uncannily gorgeous Knightley and a supremely decadent Sam Neill (as her dreadful seducer) keep their characters vital. The limitations of the small screen duly noted, the frosty location shooting is handsome. Given the choice, see the Lean film on the big screen every time; but this is a sturdy introduction to a classic story. --Robert Horton
What kind of Dr Zhivago do you want?
Review date: 2007-10-28 Rating: 6 out of 10
This new version of Dr Zhivago makes a different choice about how we should regard Zhivago. In objective terms it has always been hard to empathise with a man who does not protect his wife and child during a revolution and abandons them for his mistress. David Lean manages to convince us that the art, the poetry, that Zhivago mines from this love can enable us not to despise Zhivago. In this new version the story is just as compelling but Zhivago emerges with no credit from his behaviour. At the end of Lean's Zhivago we have been persuaded that it was a great love story: at the end of this version we can easily despise Zhivago for his behaviour.
Similar Products
Reviews
Too stunning for wordsReview date: 2007-10-16 Rating: 10 out of 10This film (in two parts) is incredible. The cinematography is beautiful, the acting impeccable, and the soundtrack by Ludovico Einaudi is a both stunning and haunting at the same time. The story flows well, the backdrops of the Russian Revolution and the First World War are well portrayed, and their effect on the main protagonists' lives is utterly compelling. You feel something for each character, whether it be empathy with Yury and Lara, pity or sorrow for Tonya and Pasha, or bitterness and contempt towards Komarovsky. Every character stirs a range of emotions. This is a film that really touches the emotions to make you think about human nature, and wonder at how lives can be turned around by chance meetings, and the wider goings on of the world around you; how these events can be a blessing, but also how they can turn things upside down.
This adaptation is also a very good realisation of the book, and portrays Pasternak's ideas well.
Highly recommended!spend a day or two with both films, and a week with the novelReview date: 2007-09-14 Rating: 8 out of 10as other reviewers have expressed their preferences for "the film" Lean's 1965 masterpiece, or the cover (2002 mini series) i will forgo much that should be said about each, but suggest watching them in tandem, or even breaking each up into episodes. for example, to stop the film at similar points that the mini series breaks episodes, would allow more than a comparison, rather an integration. take the long path and open up the book, try a chapter or a few until you find comfortable break point, then play the comparable segment from each cinematic production. what you get is a broadly emotional and intellectual experience, especially if you stop to think a bit about that particular sequence and relations to life as you experience it.
as to the actors ... i have long been a fan or sam neill from his early bbc work, but found his portrayal of komorovsky shallow in terms of his capability ... was it a purposeful direction or interpretation .. or just weak?
kira k .... umm, i fell in love with her in "bend it like beckham," for which she was absolutely perfect, but did a ho hum for pirates ... although zhivago introduced an interesting conundrum, was she just doing a miserable job of acting or was she directed to play such an ambiguous character, slightly naive, not quite powerful enough to take the horrors of war in the nursing scenes, etc... as girl-woman, she failed at each imho lounging somewhere in between while overplaying the "sex object" role, probably her best scene was with little yuri when she stepped into the waiting police hands ..
as to what's his name actor who tried to do zhivago ... it reminded me of the hollywood bratpack doing a cover of a real cowboy movie ... for me, he lacked the depth of zhivago, although maybe the confusion was real ..
having just finished watching the 2002 mini, it did not seem that long, which is a complement to the director, although much of it was excellently shot, i honestly cannot remember any scenes that took me up out from my seat or embedded themselves in my mind, especially when compared to the film which i watched for the umpteenth time 3 months ago.
but the miracle of film is that it interprets the book in an abstracted manner than can be watched in many pieces or as a whole "text" in a fraction of the time needed for reading the written work. i cannot disparage the efforts of director, cast & crew of the 2002 version, but would use it as infill to complement the original film, and would view both of them as providing both visual and emotional background for the book ... finally, i would suggest a good short history of the several decades leading up to revolution and civil war, along with that a much less romantic epic novel in Mikhail Sholokov's trilogy (quiet flows the don) lays out the paradoxes of cossack and peasant, red & white during that period in a way that pasternak was unable to as an urban literati goodReview date: 2007-02-28 Rating: 2 out of 10it's good that no one has bought this film because the David lean version is by far better. Spend your money elsewere and get Doctor Zhivago by david lean and omar sharif. A modernized versionReview date: 2006-07-26 Rating: 4 out of 10When the producer, director and screenplay writer of this refer repeatedly in the DVD's extras to "The Film" this isn't to their own made-for-TV effort but to David Lean's sprawling masterpiece. The premise they all have is that while The Film is a masterpiece, almost canonical (and their tone is quite reverential) The Film has dated and it is their challenging task to update its 1960s style to the present. Fair enough. How well did they succeed in their 225 minute adaptation?
David Lean painted on a big canvas and the makers are at pains to point out their budget didn't allow them to do this but instead gave them the opportunity to concentrate on characterisation and to be more faithful to Pasternak's novel.
Ironically the film doesn't suffer noticeably from having a lower budget and it isn't in the panoramic scenes that this production shows up as inferior to The Film. Such scenes are all well done and are probably the best aspect of the modern Dr Zhivago. Trains, war, snow and horror are all there in convincing (and sometimes gruesome) detail.
It's far less successful either in comparison to The Film or standing on its own two feet in other areas. To begin with, the soundtrack/music is unmemorable and also slightly odd in places (Were they Peruvian pipes on the steppes?).
It doesn't succeed in other areas either, notably in the acting and direction. Hans Matteson gives a fine if workaday performance as the doctor and Maryam d'Abo is excellent in the schizophrenic role of Lara's mother, Alexandra Maria Lara is tearful and warm and attractive as Tonya (and this, by the way, makes it more difficult to accept that Zhivago should leave her for Keira Knightley's slightly soppy Lara.)
TV filming takes you up closer to the actor than cinema filming and this effect does not help Keira Knightley in her part at all. She seems often to have an ironic smile playing on her lips as if she's not taking seriously what is happening to her or around her. So why should we? This grin gets in the way far too often and jars most dreadfully and inappropriately when it pops up once again even when she's being taken away to her drawn-out punishment and probable death in the labour camp at the end. She cannot be blamed for the school scene where her flamboyant classroom teacher (all waving arms and enthusiasm) looks horribly wrong in the 19th century schoolroom setting - serried ranks of silenced children were the style of the time. This is poor direction, pure and simple and Lara looks too modern too often.
Bill Paterson, Celia Imrie and Sam Neill do quite well but Kris Marshall struggles as Pasha and you get a less sinister Strelnikov than you might.
There's probably a slightly better film buried in here running at 120 minutes with some critical cutting. Several name directors turned this film down, mostly because they didn't want to be compared to David Lean and I don't think they'll regret their decision looking at this result.
Product Details/Specifications
Actor(s):
Sam Neill
Hans Matheson
Sam MacLintock
Keira Knightley
Bill Paterson
Creators:
Keira Knightley (Primary Contributor)
Sam Neill (Primary Contributor)
Alison Barnett (Producer)
Andy Harries (Producer)
Anne Pivcevic (Producer)
Giovanna Arata (Producer)
Hugh Warren (Producer)
Andrew Davies (Writer)
Boris Pasternak (Writer)
Director(s):
Recording label: Cinema Club Manufacturer: Cinema ClubEAN: 5014138300135Binding: DVDNumber of items: 1Format: Anamorphic, PAL, Release date: 2004-07-12Number of discs: 1Aspect ratio: 1.78:1Audience rating: Suitable for 15 years and overRegion code: 2Running time: 226 minutesTheatrical release date: 2003-11-02Language: English (Original Language)