RRP: £9.99
Our Price: £19.99 (subject to change)
Editorial
Amazon.co.uk Review
Shackleton is not a biopic of the great Anglo-Irish explorer but a dramatisation of the failed trans-Antarctic expedition of 1914-16. As written and directed by Charles (Longtitude) Sturridge the production, filmed on real ice floes in Greenland, stays remarkably close to the facts, capturing the look of the surviving expedition photos of Frank Hurley (collected in the book South With Endurance) with great fidelity. Kenneth Branagh makes no attempt at an authentic accent but otherwise gives a powerful impression of a most commanding personality. When the expedition ship Endurance became locked in the Antarctic ice Shackleton vowed to bring every man home alive, and against virtually impossible odds, including a 700-mile journey in an open boat through some of the worst seas in the world, he did just that. This superlative mini-series realises the story with production values and cinematography which would not disgrace a big-budget feature (Hurley's own 1919 documentary film can be seen on video in South). Intense physical drama, strong performances and Adrian Johnston's fine score combine here to deeply moving effect, marred only a little by a rushed conclusion. With Roland Huntford, author of the definitive Shackleton biography, as production advisor, this easily stands as the benchmark for all future comparable films. --Gary S Dalkin
Almost brilliant, but...
Review date: 2008-08-08 Rating: 8 out of 10
I SO wanted to give this five stars. If I would ever claim to have a hero, Shackleton is the man I would name and this could have been the defining biopic of his tremendous adventure in the Antarctic in 1914-1916. It has the directorial heft of Charles Sturridge (Brideshead Revisited. Need I say more?), who also wrote the screen play but it has it faults:
1) What a shame it was filmed in Greenland rather than the correct hemisphere. I know this was due to the problem of finding manageable conditions in which to work but it's a bit like finding that a film about Lawrence of Arabia was shot in Nevada.
2) In the course of the 3hr20min film, far too much concentration is placed on the fundraising and organisational preamble. Important to a degree, this nonetheless feels like too long an overture for a great action story.
3) The story is essentially composed of four parts: the escape from the ice on the floes, the journey of the James Caird, the plight of those on Elephant Island and the epic crossing of South Georgia. The first of these is well done, though too compressed to show how arduous it really was. The second part is a pretty poor cop out, with only one shot of the Caird at sea as it approaches the mighty wave (we get no sense of how vital Worsley's navigation was or the relief of sighting land that saved the six men from heading,lost,into the Atlantic). The existence of those men left on Elephant Island is underplayed (we get no sense of their feeling of helplessness after months without relief, nor any sense of their awful life huddled under two boats living on penguin offal and seaweed). The extraordinary crossing of South Georgia is almost treated as a Sunday walk and the actors' depiction of their utter exhaustion is rather hammed up. The greatest part of the whole story - three of these four parts - is dealt with in a hurried forty minutes and it's not enough.
4) If I were being really pedantic, I would criticise the appearance of Shackleton, Crean and Worsley as they arrive in Grytviken. They should have looked filthy, bedraggled, at the point of collapse, blistered and wasted. Sure, they look tired but Branagh has neat hair, a fluffy but neat beard and no appearance of the unspeakable devastation of their condition.
But, the good points are as follows:
1) Thank you, Mr Sturridge, for attempting a film that needed to be made.
2) The characters of Shackleton, Crean, Worsley, McIlroy, Orde-Lees, Hurley, Marston and McNeish are brilliantly caught, especially Orde-Lees.
3) The scenery, albeit in Greenland, is breathtaking.
4) The historical authenticity of the ship, the clothing, the props and the spirit of the era are all excellent.
5) Shackleton's charisma is well portrayed by Branagh - he had a remarkable personal charm and a hugely endearing rogueish appeal to women - and Branagh gets this over well but couldn't he have at least tried to emulate Shackleton's Kildare brogue?
6) The leadership of Shackleton was essential to the whole expedition. He inspired terrific loyalty in (almost) all his mean and they did what he said (almost) without question which is a mighty achievement in such desperate circumstances. That skill comes across well.
Lastly, can someone please try to make a modern film about Scott and Amundsen? By 2012, there will be a golden opportunity to capitalise on the centenary of their remarakable exploits.
Overall, a great film that makes you grateful for a warm dry bed and good fresh food but I wish it didn't feel as though they were running out of time and money 2/3 of the way through.
The biggest disappointment was that for all this time wasted on inconsequentials, they glossed over the most spectacular part of the story- that of the final journey of Shackleton and two companions over South Georgia, and the four consequent months that the others waiting with failing hope on Elephant Island. That happened in about 10 minutes... vs. 90 minutes in England....
Really disappointing, aside from some nice cinematography. Read the book and leave the rest up to your imagination.