Author and teacher Thad Beaumont (Timothy Hutton) finds himself torn between those extremes when he "kills" his profitable alter ego, George Stark (the bestselling dark half to Thad's light), who then assumes evil, autonomous form (again played by Hutton) to defend lethally his role in Thad's creative endeavours. Forced to wrestle with this evil manifestation of his own unformed twin, Thad must fight to protect his wife (Amy Madigan), their twin babies and himself. While Romero skilfully develops the twin/duality theme to explore the writer's dilemma, Hutton is outstanding in his dual roles, playing Stark (in subtly fiendish makeup) as a redneck rebel with a knack for slashing throats. Julie Harris adds class in a supporting role, and horror fans will relish Romero's climactic showdown, in which swarms of sparrows seal Stark's fate. It favours a pulp sensibility with clunky exposition to explain Stark's existence, but The Dark Half is a laudable effort from everyone involved. --Jeff Shannon, Amazon.com
RRP: £12.99
Our Price: £1.87 (subject to change)
Editorial
Amazon.co.uk Review
Although it lacks the creepy subtleties of Stephen King's celebrated novel, George Romero's underrated adaptation of The Dark Half is among the best films based on King's fiction, with Romero taking care to honour the central theme while serving up some gruesome gore in the film's much-criticised finale. Inspired by King's own admission that he wrote several novels under the pseudonym Richard Bachman, The Dark Half explores the duality of a writer's impulse, ranging from literary respectability to the viscerally cathartic thrills of exploitative pulp fiction.
AN UNDERRATED ROMERO FILM
Review date: 2007-11-01 Rating: 8 out of 10
Thad Beaumont, (Timothy Hutton) a college professor and writer under the name George Stark, decides to finally give up his successful name and go public with it. With his wife Liz's, (Amy Madigan) support, he gives the telling interview and gets the secret out. When a series of deaths relating to the people who set the interview session, Sheriff Alan Pangborn, (Michael Rooker) finds that Thad is the one responsible. Liz worries that Thad might be next, and he tries to get Alan on his side. When he finally has the evidence to finger the culprit, he draws him out to a final battle.
The Good News: For the third teeming, Romero and King make the best of the director's non-zombie movies. The dark feeling that he has in those films is very much in appearance here, giving it a distinctive flavor while also imparting something new to the story. The slasher quotient is greatly enhanced the typical Romero sub-text to his movies, and the deaths are quite brutal. Being beaten to death, stabbed in the head and several graphic slit throats are present as well, making it a quite well varied collection of deaths. The final one is the highlight of the film, but won't be revealed here because it is so great. Really one to stay and watch for. The action is nicely spread out, and really doesn't seem rushed at all, which is the double-edged sword of being a little on the long side, but that means it's a little more character related than several others that are quite similar. A couple of times it actually manages to draw some suspense and shocks from the kills. They're all quite nice, so it's nothing to be spoiled, but it actually manages a jump or two. That's a similar Romero trademark found in different movies and continues on in here.
The Bad News: This film is probably about ten minutes too long. It's got a few too many story lines than it needs to have, and it at times can be a little confusing. It also seems just a little bit repetitive in the middle, which is no doubt due to the too long length. The same three general sequences of events play out several times over, and it gets a little tiresome.
The Final Verdict: Taken on its own terms, and especially compared to the generally dismal run of films adapted from King's work, it's an artfully crafted, serious psychological horror movie. Recommended viewing for King fans, as well as those looking for good Romero films beyond his renowned zombie work.
I thoroughly enjoyed the book this film was based on and rated it one of my favourites - until I saw this film. Yet again a Stephen King film is shoddily adapted to the big screen, disappointing anyone who has read it.
Admittedly it's hard to make an adaptation that compares well to the story (especially when you take into account the imagery involved in a horror story) but I feel that this one failed miserably.
On the other hand, one of my friends who has never read the book quite enjoyed it (would rate it a 3/5), but could see the above point as soon as they read the original story.
If you are a Staphen King fan, watch it. If not, it's just an average horror film with a different twist.